Re: CGA Proposal

Nick Name <[email protected]>(by way of Nick Name\ <[email protected]>)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.haskell.gui
Message-ID <E19olro-00007W-00@bucefalo>
Il 09:21, domenica 17 agosto 2003, hai scritto:
> Sure, that would be great! Now is the time. Is there a document like
> "Human Interface Guidelines"  for KDE? We should check such a document
> to make sure that we don't violate KDE's requirement.

Yes, I got it, I printed it, but can't find any time here to read it against
the recent CGA "specifications". After the 24th, as I said, I am going to
help that way.

> I omitted the
> Athena/Xt back-end for now as well, since I couldn't find any
> documentation about user interface guidelines (David?). We surely need
> to look at that, too.

Maybe it's so different that we will have a "basic CGA" wich works also onto
Xt, a "restricted CGA" wich also works on ncurses or similar libraries (I am
not joking at all, there are many uses for that), and an "enhanced CGA" wich
works only onto higher level interfaces like gnome and kde.

When I think about this, I guess that we have to find a comfortable way to
choose what toolkit to use at runtime.

Bye

Vincenzo
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.