Re: GLUT documentation

Ross Paterson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.haskell.cvs.libraries,gmane.comp.lang.haskell.hopengl
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 01:16:08PM +0100, Sven Panne wrote:
> Ross Paterson wrote:
> > According to fptools/libraries/GLUT/Graphics/UI/GLUT.hs, the documentation
> > of the GLUT package is derived from a document with the notice
> > 
> > > Copyright (c) 1994, 1995, 1996 by Mark J. Kilgard, Silicon Graphics, Inc.
> > > No part of this documentation may be reproduced, in any form or by any
> > > means, without permission in writing from the original author.
> > 
> > Do you have this permission, and if so what are its limits?
> 
> No, I haven't been able yet to contact Mark Kilgard in any way. I've
> tried several times, but never received an answer, neither positive
> nor negative. I've sent mails directly to Mark's current company, NVIDIA,
> and tried to contact him via 'Mr. OpenGL' himself, John Leech at SGI,
> without avail.
> 
> Other projects (Mesa, several other OpenGL bindings, ...) simply use
> the documentation rather unchanged, but obviously don't care about
> legal issues. The HOpenGL-GLUT docs are *not* simply a cut-n-paste job,
> the API is quite different from the C API, so I finally got a bit fed up
> with this legal issue...   >:-(

I don't see this as a legal issue -- his wishes are dreadfully clear,
unless we hear to the contrary.  It is very inconvenient, but that's
not the same thing.

> I'm a little bit clueless about how to proceed. Perhaps I should nuke
> the above passage from the documentation and replace it with credits
> to Mark.

I'm afraid that nothing but removing all of Mark Kilgard's words would
respect his wishes.  I know that's terrible, but I see no alternative.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.