Re: EXT_framebuffer_object support.
"Balazs Komuves" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.haskell.hopengl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I think we should have some testing and code review before trying to merge it with the official repository (there is a reason I did not publicised this before, though the FBO stuff is fairly new). For example I just discovered two (very minor) bugs by trying to generate Haddock documentation. The API isn't set into stone either; I hope it's reasonable enough, but some changes may be beneficial. After that, well, Sven Panne reads this mailing list, and he is the maintainer. It would be nice to hear his opinion. Balazs On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Corey O'Connor <[email protected]>wrote: > Excellent stuff! I like having the framebuffer texture functions check > the status as well. That's a handy addition. > So how do we get your patch into the mainline repo? I'd hate to have > another person duplicate the same work again. > > Cheers, > Corey O'Connor > > > _______________________________________________ HOpenGL mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hopengl