Re: EXT_framebuffer_object support.
"Balazs Komuves" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.haskell.hopengl |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Having a separate public development repo for the experimental stuff is a good idea. Maybe we can ask for project space on the code.haskell.org community server? They have all the infrastructure in place already. Balazs > Hm. I certainly agree that testing and API review is required for > release. However I'd prefer other developers to have easy access to > these patches through a main development repository than not. If API > stability is a concern with the main repository then I suggest having > two repositories: One for development and another for stable use. > > Cheers, > Corey > > > On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Corey O'Connor <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> Excellent stuff! I like having the framebuffer texture functions check > >> the status as well. That's a handy addition. > >> So how do we get your patch into the mainline repo? I'd hate to have > >> another person duplicate the same work again. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Corey O'Connor > >> > >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ HOpenGL mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/hopengl