Re: OpenGL-Raw generator

On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 4:44 PM, L Corbijn <[email protected]> wrote:
> 1. What should be in the top ...Raw.hs, currently it houses all
> functions and enum values, should it remain that way? Especially
> considering that the current generator builds a set of about 400
> modules. My personal preference would be to only export the latest
> OpenGL specification or something alike (and the export of
> GetProcAddress should be removed any way).

In my opinion, there just shouldn't be a top Raw.hs. The Core* modules
are already there. I don't think it's too much of a burden to be
explicit about what you want when using the package.

> 2. [...] Thus the question arises how much of the
> current structure should be kept?

I don't care much about backward compatibility, but others might.

- Jake