Re: Multiple definitions does not result in an error

Ross Paterson <[email protected]> Wed, 30 Aug 2006 20:02:40 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.haskell.hugs.bugs
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 05:39:07PM +0100, Neil Mitchell wrote:
> The following code:
> 
> >f a = undefined
> >f :: a -> b
> >f a = undefined
> 
> Under Hugs May 2006 does not raise an error.
> I guess Hugs is wrong in this case.

Yes, function bindings are supposed to be contiguous.  Now fixed.