Re: :t / :f inconsistencies

> The current setup seems logical to me:
>
>         :type <expr>
>         :find <name>
>         :info <name>
>
> I often use :t with more complex expressions, so it's no surprise.

I only ever use :t with names, so in my mind ":type <name>" is the reality.

> Changing it probably would do no harm, except for the extra
> complication; it just doesn't seem worth it to me.
If it doesn't actually cause anyone harm, then it would certainly be
of benefit to me, as I consistently get this wrong.

Thanks

Neil