Re: Takeover of hashable and uuid & uuid-types packages

My general view is that it's best for each package (or closely allied
family of packages) to have its own GitHub organization.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021, 11:27 AM Oleg Grenrus <[email protected]> wrote:

> github.com/haskell is fine too. I have uneasy feeling about its current
> "chaotic good" management model though, but I can live with it.
>
> OTOH, you can simply bother me about any package in haskellari org. Clear
> and simple.
>
> - Oleg
> On 16.2.2021 17.56, Johan Tibell wrote:
>
> I'm not involved anymore so it's fine by me but why not
> https://github.com/haskell?
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 4:26 PM Oleg Grenrus <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I ask to take over the maintenance of hashable, uuid and uuid-types
>> packages.
>>
>> I'm a maintainer of packages depending on them (most notably
>> quickcheck-instances and aeson).
>>
>> I should also mention that when we (Herbert and I) took over Antoine
>> Latter's packages, I took over quickcheck-instances and Herbert took
>> over uuid and parsec. We should taken over together in the first place.
>>
>> My first points of action would be:
>> - make a releases supporting latest versions of dependencies (GHC-9.0,
>> bytestring-0.11) and
>> - move packages to https://github.com/haskellari organization, so in
>> case of my absence there are people (Ryan Scott, bodigrim, few others)
>> who will be able to act.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Oleg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries