Re: Proposal: Expanding the CLC
Gershom B <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.haskell.libraries |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <34781033-c0b4-4ea0-b684-04a8e80436b9@Spark> |
I tend to agree. The CLC is a deliberative body with some action components. (The name “committee” is a tell). One wants those smaller to reach consensus sooner. Having more maintainers for “core” and “near-core” packages (and perhaps formalizing more the latter) is very good. Asking these maintainers be on the CLC doesn’t seem to be necessary to solve any proximate problem? -g On Feb 17, 2021, 5:47 AM -0500, Alexey Khudaykov <[email protected]>, wrote: > > I think that we should understand what exactly does CLC do? What should it do? _______________________________________________ Libraries mailing list [email protected] http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries