Re: Give MonadTrans a QuantifiedConstraints superclass

Henning Thielemann <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.haskell.libraries
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021, Zemyla wrote:

> I feel like instead, MonadTrans should have a function
> (>>==) :: Monad m => t m a -> (a -> t m b) -> t m b
> 
> That way, it can prove it's a Monad while still staying Haskell 98.

I prefer that.
_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.