Re: Proposal: Make Eq type class single method

There are the DefaultSuperclassInstances and Intrinsic Superclasses 
which aim to provide in-compiler support for such transitions:

https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/wikis/intrinsic-superclasses

But also code-modding would benefit from being used here, and maybe 
retrie (https://hackage.haskell.org/package/retrie)
would benefit from being used at scale?


Le 25/10/2021 à 19:05, Ryan Trinkle a écrit :
> Is there a language feature that could be built that would reduce the 
> cost of inter-package refactors like this in the future?
>
> On October 25, 2021 4:06:46 PM UTC, "Hécate" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>     Hi Joachim :)
>
>     I will have to express a friendly but firm disagreement on the argument of a
>     "one time cost".
>     You will also have to open PRs for every library, change pedagogical
>     material,
>     broadcast those changes to developers, and provide scripts for code-modding
>     tools in order to automate this on proprietary codebases.
>
>     Side-proposal
>
>     If you really want to break a bunch of things and fix mistake of the past,
>     I would suggest to really go for the throat and have PartialEq,
>     PartialOrd, Eq, and Ord
>
>     We could finally get rid of the Eq instance for the various IEEE types
>     like Double, and promote
>     property testing to the wider public to verify that the laws are indeed
>     respected by the implementations.
>
>
>     module NewClasses where
>
>     import Prelude hiding (Eq(..), Ord(..))
>
>     -- | Equality comparisons which are partial equivalence relations.
>     class PartialEq a where
>         (==) :: a -> a -> Bool
>
>     -- | Equality comparisons which are equivalence relations.
>     -- It is laws-only and manual implementations would be
>     -- verified through property testing.
>     class PartialEq a => Eq a
>
>     -- | Partial order
>     class PartialEq a => PartialOrd a where
>         compare' :: a -> a -> Maybe Ordering
>         (<) :: a -> a -> Bool
>         (<=) :: a -> a -> Bool
>         (>) :: a -> a -> Bool
>         (>=) :: a -> a -> Bool
>
>     -- | Total order
>     class (PartialOrd a, Eq a) => Ord a where
>         compare :: a -> a -> Ordering
>         max :: a -> a -> a
>         min :: a -> a -> a
>
>
>     Cheers,
>     Hécate
>
>     Le 25/10/2021 à 15:22, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
>
>         Hi, ah, yes, let me summarize my main motivation (perf
>         benefits were just a side-benefit I was hoping for): You can’t
>         implement (/=) faster than (==) (up to, in the worst case, the
>         cost of a single `not`, which often gets optimized away
>         anyways). As such, having (/=) in Eq was a (small) mistake
>         back then, and it’s worth fixing. There is one time cost of
>         asking developers to _remove_ code. But code that was probably
>         not worth writing in the first place! And I don’t blame them,
>         the Eq class _invites_ writing that code. Then the benefits
>         are twofold: * No more awkwards explanations about silly
>         things in the likely first type class that developers care
>         about. * Less code to read, maintain, compile in all the
>         libraries that _do_ define (/=) right now. * Devs who
>         instantiate Eq in the future will not be tricked into
>         wondering if they need to implement (/=) and why. So even if
>         “helps teaching beginners” doesn’t beat “having to bug
>         maintainers”, then maybe the second point (“saving all
>         develpers time and effort in the future”) does? Cheers, Joachim 
>
>
>     -- Hécate ✨ 🐦: @TechnoEmpress IRC: Hecate WWW:
>     https://glitchbra.in RUN: BSD
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     Libraries mailing list [email protected]
>     http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-- 
Hécate ✨
🐦: @TechnoEmpress
IRC: Hecate
WWW:https://glitchbra.in
RUN: BSD

_______________________________________________
Libraries mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries