RE: FW: TH restrictions

| >|     foo = and
| >|     bar = [| foo |]
| >|
| >| in one module used to be OK whereas now it gives
| >|
| >|     No instance for (Language.Haskell.TH.Syntax.Lift ([Bool] ->
Bool))
| >

I have just fixed this.

Kean asked:

| I came accross this one and thought it was a feature.  If this could
be
| fixed it would actually have more impact... one question though, what
| happens if:
| 
| [d| dec 1 |]
| [d| dec 2 |]
| 
| We refer to some thing spliced in "dec 1" inside the quasi-quotes of
| "dec 2"?

You'll have to give a more precise example. In my example, the
occurrence of 'foo' referred to a lexically-visible binding for foo.
You might need $(dyn "foo") in your example.  However, you can say

	$(furgle ...)
	x = [| foo |]
where furgle returns a binding for foo, say [d| foo = and |]; that
should work fine.

Simon