Re: Binding again

Keean Schupke <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.haskell.template
Message-ID <[email protected]> 
Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:

>[cut]
>
>But a 'yes' to Q2 might be considered inconvenient, because you might
>generate lots of (newName "f"), and they'd then clash.
>
>Views?
>  
>
Erm confusing... what about:

d2 :: Q [Dec]
d2 = do
	f1 <- newName "f"
	f2 <- newName "f"
	fn1 <- funD f1 ...
	fn2 <- funD f2 ...
	return [fn1,fn2]

Keean
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.