RE: FW: TH restrictions

Ian, I don't think I understand what you are saying here. What is your
number 1?

Simon

| -----Original Message-----
| From: Ian Lynagh [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ian
Lynagh
| Sent: 05 December 2004 03:03
| To: Simon Peyton-Jones; [email protected]
| Subject: Re: FW: [Template-haskell] TH restrictions
| 
| On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 01:15:25AM +0000, Ian Lynagh wrote:
| >
| > For what it's worth, I think one of the biggest irritations I've had
| > with writing stuff using TH is the need to split things across
module
| > boundaries.
| 
| Actually, I think this is number 2 on my list, below portability.
| 
| As I said recently, I've hacked something I wrote to print out TH
| generated code for use on a platform without ghci+TH, which is a pain
| but not a showstopper for myself.
| 
| However, I wanted to unroll the inner loop in SHA1 (essentially says
"do
| this for n = 0..79") for darcs, and really don't want it to get into
the
| situation of having to maintain generated code for platforms without
| ghci+TH. So for the time being I have to leave it either in a slower
HO
| form or the fast but ugly hand-unrolled form.
| 
| I appreciate that this is also a hard problem to solve; I just thought
| I'd let you know it is an issue.
| 
| (In general portability to other implementations may be an issue too,
of
| course, although darcs currently doesn't support them anyway)
| 
| 
| Thanks
| Ian