Re: Revisiting the with() method

In a recent discussion with jer, I received the same answer.  Basically, 
use with(...) as a constructor, making sure that your setters and with() 
method return self.
-->Jake

On 11/9/2011 11:11 PM, dennisf486 wrote:
>
> I found a thread from 2006 where Steve Dekorte recommended "with" for 
> an object initialization question. I have a similar situation as the 
> OP. Is "with" still the recommended best practice for an object 
> construction method name?
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/iolanguage/message/8529
>
>