Re: Problem building Io with the addons

Nope.  Last I knew, they were looking for devs for acute's stdlib.
-->Jake

On 2/19/2012 5:00 PM, Duke Normandin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 22:30:46 +0100
> Jan-Paul Bultmann <[email protected] 
> <mailto:janpaulbultmann%40me.com>> wrote:
>
> > On 19.02.2012, at 21:48, Duke Normandin <[email protected] 
> <mailto:dukeofperl%40ml1.net>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:24:51 +0100
> > > Jan-Paul Bultmann <[email protected] 
> <mailto:janpaulbultmann%40me.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > On a scale from 1 - 10, what do you suppose the probability of
> > > these issues being fixed anytime soon? :)
> > >
> > > > Probably nothing, there are parts of the main Io
> > > > implementation that are simply broken. Cheers
> > > >
> > > > On 19.02.2012, at 21:05, Duke Normandin <[email protected] 
> <mailto:dukeofperl%40ml1.net>>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Sun, 19 Feb 2012 11:15:21 -0500
> > > > > gatesphere <[email protected] 
> <mailto:gatesphere%40gmail.com>> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Congrats, and enjoy Io :)
> > > > > > -->Jake
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll defer basking in the "congrats" until I can figure
> > > > > what I'm doing wrong! :)
> > > > > --
> > > > > Duke
> > > > >
> > >
> > Depends, some of us are currently working on an alternative Io
> > implementation to address a lot of these issues. For the mainline
> > I can't make a proper estimate, but without more contributors for
> > this huge huge code base it's looking dim IMHO.
> >
>
> I suppose a person would have to be an exceptional C hacker to make
> any sort of valid contribution towards Io or its alternative?
>
>