Re: [jruby-user] [ANN] ruby-pg for JRuby
John Shahid <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Feb 2015 23:59:08 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.jruby.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAE5=+KV8wwm2ObDZp_cuSZ4AMHFXTDpKY+OT4mcDRfipZn+ypQ@mail.gmail.com> |
good question. there are two advantages that i can think of, first is asynchronous io and second is that jruby-pg is a drop in replacement for the ruby-pg gem. also afaik the jdbc interface of postgresql has some limitations regarding large object api and others that i don't remember off the top of my head. granted this isn't something that everyone needs, especially new projects, but it was a blocker to switch to jruby for some teams in the past. cheers, js On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 3:32 PM Tim Uckun <[email protected]> wrote: > What would be the advantage of this gem vs the JDBC gems? > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:05 AM, John Shahid <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> Sorry for the double post. I posted this earlier to the announcements >> mailing list, but didn't get any feedback. So I'm posting here in the users >> mailing list hoping to get more audience. >> >> Some of you might have come across the JRuby friendly ruby-pg gem >> https://github.com/headius/jruby-pg. Unfortunately I started this work >> more than a year ago. I didn't have time to fix the issues that were >> reported or keep it up to date with the ruby-pg gem. Recently, I got some >> leisure time and rewrote a big chunk of the gem to make it compatible with >> 0.17.1. I've tested the gem with JRuby 1.7.18 and all the tests pass. The >> active record (v3.2.21) tests pass as well. >> >> That makes confident to release the gem, may be a release candidate for >> now. It looks like the ruby-pg guys are willing to merge the changes in >> their repo but it might take a while to do so. I think this gem should be >> released separately for the now. Unless I get any feedback soon, I'll go >> with jruby-pg. >> >> Cheers, >> >> JS >> > >