Re: [jruby-user] Which Rack web server?
Uwe Kubosch <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:28:05 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.jruby.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
We are using Puma and are very happy with it. We used to use trinidad = and were happy with that to. The http://www.madebymarket.com/blog/dev/ruby-web-benchmark-report.html = was a trigger for us to switch in addition to puma supporting both MRI = and JRuby. heroku=E2=80=99s move to puma as the recommended rack server = was also a factor. We have been looking at torquebox 4 (not torquebox 3), but we will stick = with puma for a long while, I think. > On 2015-04-27, at 18:55, John Joseph Bachir = <[email protected]> wrote: >=20 > Which Rack web server are folks using with JRuby? Any particularly bad = or good experiences? >=20 > I suppose the only ones that support threading are Puma and Passenger? -- Uwe Kubosch [email protected] http://kubosch.no/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email