Re: [jruby-user] Which Rack web server?

Uwe Kubosch <[email protected]> Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:28:05 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.jruby.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
We are using Puma and are very happy with it.  We used to use trinidad =
and were happy with that to.

The http://www.madebymarket.com/blog/dev/ruby-web-benchmark-report.html =
was a trigger for us to switch in addition to puma supporting both MRI =
and JRuby.  heroku=E2=80=99s move to puma as the recommended rack server =
was also a factor.

We have been looking at torquebox 4 (not torquebox 3), but we will stick =
with puma for a long while, I think.


> On 2015-04-27, at 18:55, John Joseph Bachir =
<[email protected]> wrote:
>=20
> Which Rack web server are folks using with JRuby? Any particularly bad =
or good experiences?
>=20
> I suppose the only ones that support threading are Puma and Passenger?

--
Uwe Kubosch
[email protected]
http://kubosch.no/





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:

    http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email