The 2 vs. 3 debate.

Hi all,

Seeing the enormous pain that cpython is going through with the 2 vs. 3
debate, and getting people to move to 3, I wonder if there anything that
jython can do in advance to help prevent some of this pain.

For example, maybe jython 2.x executables and links should be named
"jython2" explicitly, to prevent the kind of confusion and disagreement
that is currently going on in the "what does the /usr/bin/python link point
to?" debate. When jython 3.x becomes available, it could be explicitly
called "jython3".

A little forethought now might save a lot of pain down the road.

Just a thought.

Alan.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at 10am PDT/1PM EDT
Develop your own process in accordance with the BPMN 2 standard
Learn Process modeling best practices with Bonita BPM through live exercises
http://www.bonitasoft.com/be-part-of-it/events/bpm-camp-virtual- event?utm_
source=Sourceforge_BPM_Camp_5_6_15&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA_SF

_______________________________________________
Jython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev