Re: Benchmark results across all major Python implementations

Jim Baker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.python.devel,gmane.comp.lang.jython.devel
Message-ID <CAOhO=aNggmjCpQMQ+u1TyU3qvRTwMC2CCMJwR560va0ZR8wffQ@mail.gmail.com>
Brett,

Very cool, I'm glad to see that Jython's performance was competitive under
most of these benchmarks. I would also be interested in joining the
proposed mailing list.

re elementtree - I assume the benchmarking is usually done with
cElementTree. However Jython currently lacks a Java equivalent, so
importing cElementTree just uses the pure Python version. Hence the
significant performance difference of approx. 40x for etree_parse and 16x
for etree_iterparse.

- Jim

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Brett Cannon <[email protected]> wrote:

> I gave the opening keynote at PyCon CA and then gave the same talk at
> PyData NYC on the various interpreters of Python (Jupyter notebook of my
> presentation can be found at bit.ly/pycon-ca-keynote; no video yet). I
> figured people here might find the benchmark numbers interesting so I'm
> sharing the link here.
>
> I'm still hoping someday speed.python.org becomes a thing so I never have
> to spend so much time benchmarking so may Python implementations ever again
> and this sort of thing is just part of what we do to keep the
> implementation ecosystem healthy.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/jbaker%40zyasoft.com
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.