Re: Proposing a beta 3 for 2.7.1

Darjus Loktevic <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.jython.devel
Message-ID <CAFiRLmk-5OdjQQYu9HQhAUHqzoPRWhQCe5p8KafrTgJGmG7Lkg@mail.gmail.com>
Agree with Jim,

These are critical enough to have sorted out, but we should not not make
any kind of release either, and we are really close to a nice release.

Darjus

On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 1:23 PM Jim Baker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hope everyone in the US had a happy Thanksgiving yesterday!
>
> You may have noticed that we have not done a release candidate. Me too!
> This is because we have two regressions compared to 2.7.0 that must be
> fixed:
>
> * pip is no longer installs executables correctly, including itself in
> ensurepip, due to shebang quoting issues on OS X; and not using
> zip-executable format on Windows. (The workaround is to use jython -m pip;
> this is probably why we didn't catch it earlier, because it is standard
> practice to use -m pip.) See http://bugs.jython.org/issue2360
>
> * The ssl module no longer validates certificates using system provided
> certs (in our case, provided by the JRE). See
> http://bugs.jython.org/issue2390
>
> Both of these bugs are marked as urgent, which we have used in the bug
> tracker to mark *blocking bugs*.
>
> I'm still hopeful that we can resolve these very shortly. In addition, it
> would still be nice, but not blocking, to get Java 9 support working. Other
> bugs remain open to be fixed. Please no more regressions however ;)
>
> We also have a number of other changes that have been made. Although the
> slipped date is not great for us, by far the most important thing is for us
> to have a high quality release for 2.7.1. Therefore I would like for us to
> do a beta 3 so that we can shake out things better.
>
> Given holiday realities, I'm proposing mid December for a beta 3, and mid
> January for a release candidate. So this slips us by 2 months. But
> regardless we will first fix our blocking bugs. The alternative, to back
> out changes, is not realistic for our comparatively small group of
> committers. But we will have better automated testing to prevent pip and
> ssl regressing in this way in the future.
>
> - Jim
>
> (Tomorrow I will be on vacation for a week, sailing in the Gulf of
> California out of La Paz, Mexico. I plan to be very unreachable!)
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Jython-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Jython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.