Re: Eliminating Special Method Lookup

Jim Baker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.jython.devel
Message-ID <CAOhO=aO0oK+kpJPQ+uY+91d57TAF8fefFeQ6B==ee_KPPmTE8w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Laura Creighton <[email protected]> wrote:

> ...
> Good to hear.  Every so often python-dev goes off and makes some
> momentous decision that has enormous impact on other python implementations
> without first checking with the other implementations to see exactly
> how much hardship this would cause.  Glad to see I was wrong in this
> case. :)
>
>
Definitely something we have to keep track of! And thanks for asking about
this specific case.

Generally it's been just random implementation details (example: various
OpenSSL-specific functionality that got swept in recently into the ssl
module as of CPython 2.7.9, although we can probably emulate once again) or
various other enhancements.

I personally also try to track bigger changes, such as static type
annotations and ensuring compatibility when combining with Java types. But
until we get a Jython 3.x under real development, it's going to be hard to
go beyond that.

- Jim

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Jython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.