Re: Eliminating Special Method Lookup
Jim Baker <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.jython.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAOhO=aO0oK+kpJPQ+uY+91d57TAF8fefFeQ6B==ee_KPPmTE8w@mail.gmail.com> |
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Laura Creighton <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > Good to hear. Every so often python-dev goes off and makes some > momentous decision that has enormous impact on other python implementations > without first checking with the other implementations to see exactly > how much hardship this would cause. Glad to see I was wrong in this > case. :) > > Definitely something we have to keep track of! And thanks for asking about this specific case. Generally it's been just random implementation details (example: various OpenSSL-specific functionality that got swept in recently into the ssl module as of CPython 2.7.9, although we can probably emulate once again) or various other enhancements. I personally also try to track bigger changes, such as static type annotations and ensuring compatibility when combining with Java types. But until we get a Jython 3.x under real development, it's going to be hard to go beyond that. - Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Jython-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev