Re: Mirror process for github broken

Yeah, I'd love us to get rid of binaries. I have a basic Gradle build
mostly working. Ideally we'd get rid of the binaries before we load into
Github properly, but that raises concerns (like pulling an older version,
history rewriting, etc.). Thoughts?

On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:34 PM Jim Baker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Darjus,
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 2:00 PM, Darjus Loktevic <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hey Guys,
>>
>> The GCE instance that does the periodic sync was down for some reason.
>> This should be fixed now.
>>
>
> Darjus, thanks for doing the resync. Everything looks good now on
> https://github.com/jythontools/jython/
>
>
>> We should seriously consider just moving to github with CPython in the
>> process already.
>>
>
> Agreed about moving to GitHub as primary and specifically using the org we
> have for this (https://github.com/jython). CPython's recent support of GH
> with core-workflow should be mature enough for us to jump on this workflow
> as well.
>
> We should get 2.7.1 out (maybe recent Windows improvements from Stefan are
> sufficient? we do have a missing file in the latest trunk, so will need
> some confirmation). At this point, maybe the best thing to do is use a
> temporary repo while we move from Ant to a Gradle + Ant custom task build;
> then switch to fully being on https://github.com/jython/jython as the
> reference location. I believe the args for having stripped out all of the
> jars from source are compelling reasons to do this; 2.7.2 and Jython 3 will
> have enough breathing room for us to make this transition.
>
> - Jim
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot

_______________________________________________
Jython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev