Re: 2.7.2 for the New Year?

A new year's 2.7.2 with a limited scope is definitely a great idea, as
is an updated GitHub based website. I'm on board!

-Frank

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 3:32 PM, Jeff Allen <[email protected]> wrote:
> All:
>
> How about it? This seems like a reasonable interval since 2.7.1.
>
> Frank/Jim: would you care to set a goal? What else ought we to have in that
> release?
>
> I think we should mean by the answer, what we'd like to see in 2.7.2b1. Then
> we only take on fixes during beta we didn't foresee or can't avoid. That
> way, we hopefully don't stay in beta very long. I'm extrapolating a bit from
> https://github.com/jython/devguide/blob/jython/devcycle.rst#stages (cloned
> from CPython) but it seems a good discipline to prevent late de-stabilising
> change.
>
> Is it perhaps as important to create a revised web site to back the release?
> (We have talked about a site we can all contribute to via GitHub.)
>
> Also, I've been meaning to ask, the current dev tip should identify as
> "2.7.1+" (not plain "2.7.1") shouldn't it? And 2.7.2a1 then 2.7.2a1+ as soon
> as we decide we're having a 2.7.2? I think I see how this works in
> build.xml.
>
> Jeff
>
> --
> Jeff Allen
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> _______________________________________________
> Jython-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot