Re: Java 7 or 8?

Jeff Allen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.jython.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Good, I'm glad that seems sensible.

I think there has to be a 2.7.3 as a target for bug-fixes etc.. For me 
2.7.2 as a thing we have to get out to clear space for 3. Separate topic.

Jeff Allen

On 02/09/2019 23:00, Pekka Klärck wrote:
> Jim Baker wrote::
>> +100
>>
>> I like this well-considered compromise. Source compatibility with Java 7 ensures it is possible for a self service model if there are users who actually need Java 7. Meanwhile we are able to ensure all of our dependencies are supported, which is key for any release.
> +1
>
>> This approach also gives an immediate path forward to being on Java 11, the only current LTS option, for a Jython 2.7.3, as well as setting up for Jython 3.x development.
> Has there been discussion lately about Jython 2.7.3 vs Jython 3? I'd
> personally like to see all efforts concentrated on Jython 3 once
> Jython 2.7.2 is out. Python 2 EOL being very near, more and more
> projects are dropping Python 2 support and at the same time they drop
> Jython support as well. For us Jython support is the primary reason to
> support Python 2 still after the EOL, but I cannot see us doing it
> past 2020 anymore.
>
> Cheers,
>      .peke

_______________________________________________
Jython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.