Re: Jython Slim Version?

There is a use case that is related to the JAR split of Jython: Using
Jython to create a sandboxed scripting environment.

That use case would call for some more fine grained splitting of the Jython
implementation. Policy permissions are granted by either by code signature
or location
https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/security/PolicyFiles.html

For the sandboxed scripting use case one would probably want to have the
Jython class loader in it's own JAR in order to restrict class loading in
there only.

I understand a lot of more work would still be involved in serving this use
case, but you could split this as a reservation, if a new jar layout is
being taken into use.

Eero Aaltonen

On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 11:40 PM Jeff Allen <[email protected]> wrote:

> I've noticed that the "project name" for the Gradle-built JAR cannot be
> "jython", because we already publish that (being the fat jar). I propose
> therefore to name it "jython-slim", in honour of this thread.
>
> It's experimental anyway: I don't have much confidence it is correctly
> built. I could really do with writing an application with it as a
> dependency. (Or others doing so during beta.)
>
> Jeff Allen
>
> On 21/05/2019 04:45, Adam Burke wrote:
> > Hi Raphail
> >
> > The dev team are working on a gradle build, one of the outputs of
> > which would be a slim jar as you describe.
> >
> > If you look on jython trunk, there is already an experimental
> > build.gradle there. You may be able to use that to build an
> > experimental jython-only jar.
> >
> > It's a complex part of the build, so if you know gradle well, I think
> > patches are also welcome.
> >
> > Cheers
> > Adam
> >
>

_______________________________________________
Jython-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jython-dev