Re: from lightweight languages to heavyweights
Matt Knox <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.lightweight |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I am presently rewriting a scheme prototype in C++-so if you define "successful" as "fulfils the requirements of a specification" rather than "made money", then I think I count. Or are you looking for commercially successful apps? On 11/15/05, Avi Bryant <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Nov 15, 2005, at 1:57 PM, Steve Dekorte wrote: > > > > > On 15-Nov-05, at PM 01:18, Matthias Felleisen wrote: > > > >> My question is: do any of you know of other examples of rewriting > >> successful applications from a lightweight language into a > >> heavyweight language? I would be interested to know a few. > >> Descriptive answers are preferred over opinions. > >> > > > > Hasn't almost all programming language research for the last 20 > > years been about rewriting Smalltalk and LISP code in other > > languages? ;-) > > Sure, but he said "successful"... (/me ducks). > > In that vein, though, I don't think it's much of a stretch to see > Eclipse as a rewrite of VAJ from Smalltalk to Java. Assuming you > count Smalltalk as lightweight (and if CL counts, it certainly does). > > Avi > > > > -- b++ pr(a+=b) while (pr(b+=a) < 10000)