RE: from lightweight languages to heavyweights

"Jenkins, Steven" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.lightweight
Message-ID <[email protected]>
I formerly worked at an investment bank, and, as part of preparation for
Y2K, several TCL-based applications were being converted to C++ or Java.

The reason given for switching from a 'lightweight' language like TCL
was that they no longer had TCL programmers around but the had plenty of
C++ and Java programmers.  It had nothing to do with language features
or capabilities, just the economics of staffing.

Steven 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthias
Felleisen
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 4:18 PM
To: '[email protected]'
Subject: [ll-discuss] from lightweight languages to heavyweights 

Paul Graham has mentioned a few times that Yahoo rewrote his ViaWeb code
from lightweight languages (let's admit CL for the sake of the argument
with the LL camp, a lot of code was a in a "true" lightweight
language) to C++. We can speculate why they did this, whether it was
good or bad. I am not interested in any of this.

My question is: do any of you know of other examples of rewriting
successful applications from a lightweight language into a heavyweight
language? I would be interested to know a few. Descriptive answers are
preferred over opinions.

-- Matthias
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.