RE: from lightweight languages to heavyweights
"Jenkins, Steven" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.lightweight |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I formerly worked at an investment bank, and, as part of preparation for Y2K, several TCL-based applications were being converted to C++ or Java. The reason given for switching from a 'lightweight' language like TCL was that they no longer had TCL programmers around but the had plenty of C++ and Java programmers. It had nothing to do with language features or capabilities, just the economics of staffing. Steven -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Matthias Felleisen Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 4:18 PM To: '[email protected]' Subject: [ll-discuss] from lightweight languages to heavyweights Paul Graham has mentioned a few times that Yahoo rewrote his ViaWeb code from lightweight languages (let's admit CL for the sake of the argument with the LL camp, a lot of code was a in a "true" lightweight language) to C++. We can speculate why they did this, whether it was good or bad. I am not interested in any of this. My question is: do any of you know of other examples of rewriting successful applications from a lightweight language into a heavyweight language? I would be interested to know a few. Descriptive answers are preferred over opinions. -- Matthias