Re: Generics vs. Message passing: object namespaces

> We seem to be at an impasse. You seem to be insisting that object
> based dispatch scales "better" and that generic dispatch has to be
> without any name space control and so doesn't scale. And "we" are
> unsuccessful at convincing you to let go of the local maxima of
> object based dispatch for a much more powerful mechanism , and the
> issue seems to be unconvincing because you have to deal directly with
> the name space issue.

    There are so many misunderstandings and misrepresentations in your
post, I am daunted by the task of correcting them collectively. 
Suffice it to say I do not believe what you think I do.  If you are
interested at all in my actual position, please re-read the prior
posts on this thread where all has been said before.