Re: [luabind] Naming library with proper SONAME

Goswin von Brederlow <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.linux.debian.devel.general,gmane.comp.lang.lua.bind.user
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Roberto C. Sánchez <[email protected]> writes:

> [My apologies in advance for the cross-posting.]
>
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:42:36AM +0100, Daniel Wallin wrote:
>> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> >>
>> > So, I've been trying to build the Debian package with the latest from
>> > the 0.8 branch on github.  It seems like the SONAME thing is not
>> > completely resolved.  I am seeing this after building:
>> > 
>> > roberto@miami:~/src/luabind-upstream$ objdump -p ./bin/gcc-4.3.2/debug/libluabindd.so.0.8.0 |grep SONAME
>> >   SONAME      libluabindd.so.0.8.0
>> 
>> Yes, that's the expected result, isn't it? The reasoning was that it's
>> too difficult to have ABI-compatibility, so we just use the complete
>> version number as the SONAME. "bjam install" will create the unversioned
>> symlink.
>> 
>
> I am curious as to what people generally think of how the libluabind
> SONAME will be going forward.  I know that certain packages (like
> libssl) have the complete version in the SONAME, but I can't imagine
> that this is a really good idea.  Is this a showstopper for having
> libluabind in Debian, or just for a stable release?  Is this
> discouraged, but otherwise permissible?
>
> I've looked in the Debian library packaging guide and it does not say
> one way or the other.
>
> I'd appreciate any insights and/or comments.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Roberto

The ABI needs to be compatible across all versions with the same
SONAME. If that means every upstream release gets a new SONAME than I
curse upstream for breaking their ABI all the time but the SONAME
would still be right. This should not really be a showstopper but
maintaining this won't be too easy. Every new upstream release will
need a binary package name change, NEW procesing and a library
transition.  You better hope that the API doesn't change as often so
binNMUs can be done.

One would hope that at some point there will be a libluabindd 1.0.0
which would then have a more stable ABI.

MfG
        Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.