Re: Library status

I've quickly hacked luabind 0.9.1 so that it supports lua 5.2 beta. Here you go
http://downloads.tuxfamily.org/bluecosmos/utils/luabind-perso.zip
(I've suppressed some "super" related code as I don't need it and it's
deprecated anyway)
It works fine with me but I may have introduced bugs. I did it for fun
and I don't intend to fork luabind or whatever.

On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Teto <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Ryan Pavlik <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I think GitHub gives us the possibility of doing a "casual" fork while we
> > don't hear from any earlier developers. As I've mentioned, I'm working on
> > it, and anyone could announce their repo as a new integration repo for
> > improvements.  It seems user-driven at this point, but there's a diversity
> > of itches and folks working on scratching them so I'm confident there will
> > still be progress.  For instance, I now have all the headers compiling
> > cleanly, and nearly all of them and the tests compiling without any warnings
> > on Clang 2.9 with -Wall -Wextra turned on.
> > Ryan
> I think so too.
> This topic is all the more interesting that lua 5.2 will soo be
> released. I am very interested in the yieldable pcall so luabind
> developers, now is the time to manifest yourselves : when will luabind
> be adapted to 5.2 ? ;)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
luabind-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/luabind-user