Re: Alternative fork for C++11

Hello,
> I believe it reduces the codebase ? It
> should make the code a lot clearer also, allowing for more third party
> contributions.
Lots of old code has gone, the statistics are about +4k -5k lines. Note
that this includes my replacement for boost::mpl usage (boost::mpl +
boost::lexical_cast are really big buggers and noone seems to care to
make c++11-ready) and other boost stuff, so it could have been even less
(plus the meta header in the end provides much more than I used at the
end). But I fear that I might have broken stuff all over the place, so
this needs testing and the provided tests do not cover the whole code.
I tried to make the stuff clearer, if anybody has improvement ideas,
I'll gladly accept patches (when I find out how to apply them :D)/ideas.
Other than that I'm watching the other repositories and try to port
their patches.

Michael

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk