Re: Who is using modified Lua versions, what are they and why?
Lourival Vieira Neto <[email protected]> Tue, 7 Jul 2026 09:11:11 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.lua.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CALHoKCZ8FMgoxx0+-ghW1i4Lu49Ei-1UN6sG79-Kf=nG_aYEiQ@mail.gmail.com> |
On Tue, Jul 7, 2026 at 8:51 AM Ką Mykolas <[email protected]> wrote: > > Some time ago I've been developing an encryption and signing tool for compiled Lua chunks. > > It involved a few slight changes in luac and lua: > - swapping calls to "require" with different call to a different function with statically determined parameters during compile time > - updating "lua_load()" (?, or some other loader related functions) with signature checks and loading from encrypted binary blob interesting; we have developed a support like this for Lunatik without modifying Lua [1, 2, 3, 4]. [1] https://luainkernel.github.io/lunatik/modules/darken.html [2] https://luainkernel.github.io/lunatik/modules/lighten.html [3] https://github.com/luainkernel/lunatik/blob/master/lib/luadarken.c [4] https://github.com/luainkernel/lunatik/blob/master/lib/lighten.lua Regards, -- Lourival Vieira Neto -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lua-l" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lua-l/CALHoKCZ8FMgoxx0%2B-ghW1i4Lu49Ei-1UN6sG79-Kf%3DnG_aYEiQ%40mail.gmail.com.