Re: Hamster
Martin Spernau <[email protected]> Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:03:31 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.lua.luacheia |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Jamie Webb wrote: >Possibility if you don't want to abandon the GPL entirely (since if you >release under a more permissive license in one place, you may as well >everywhere): LuaCheia could include only the bytecode-compiled form of >Hamster, and you could make an exception to the license for the Hamster >sources which permits the compiled code to be used in any way. This is IIRC >the approach taken for the glibc headers, and is somewhat (and necessarily) >more permissive than the LGPL. > > Hmmm, I don't thinks that's a very good solution... we are dealing with bytecode incompatible platform issues already... the socket module is an example for that... we needed to re-compile the Lua scripts on each platform (we had precompiled versions in the CVS to avoid needing luac & bin2c present during build) -Martin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click