Re: 5.1 package proposal and Kepler libs

On Dec 08, 2004 at 02:37 +0100, Adrián Pérez wrote:
> 
> >Do I understand this right: we can expand LuaCheia in a way that we 
> >can used 'both worlds' side by side? That would be my favorite.
> 
> Just that. Only some changes needed to "cheia.load" (and perhaps minor 
> changes in other functions) in order to co-operate with the new 
> "require()". I strongly believe that we can have both "cheia.load" and 
> the new "require" working side-by-side with a quite small effort.
> 
> (But I think that it would be better to abandon "cheia.load" when 
> possible, so LuaCheia could get a "Lua-standards-compliant" mention, 
> and avoiding annoyances with "cheia.load" vs. "require").
> 
> 
> I would like to see more feedback on the list before implementing 
> nothing -- only to know wether there is a general feeling about this 
> (important, I think) issue.

My opinion on the side-by-side issue is, once the usable modules in
LuaCheia are loadable using require(), then we can immediately drop
cheia.load().

Maybe others would prefer to have cheia.load() alias require() though.

-- 
Thatcher Ulrich
http://tulrich.com


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/