Re: 5.1 package proposal and Kepler libs

> I think we will not be getting much more feedback :)
> I'm sure LuaCheia has some users apart from us, but I'm not sure they are 
> reading this list and would chime in...

While I'm not currently using LuaCheia, I do regularly read this list and 
have played with it a bit.  While I would love to be able to use it, the 
lack of a beta version in the last 18 months, let alone an official release 
has made that impossible... I cannot ship a product to my end users without 
knowing that the module system will be stable at least for the lifespan of 
the current version.

I would prefer to see things migrate towards one consistant package module, 
and lose the custom cheia.load() as soon as possible.  The quicker modules 
become standardised, the better.

Love, Light and Peace,
- Peter Loveday
Director of Development, eyeon Software



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/