Re: LuaCheia and Kepler

Martin Spernau <[email protected]> Wed, 10 Mar 2004 20:01:58 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.lang.lua.luacheia
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi André!

I think I can speak for the LuaCheia team as whole that we are absolutly 
interested in working together with Kepler. Esp as we try to avoid 
re-inventing any wheels as far as possible. LuaCheia's recent move away 
from a custom Lua interpreter to a wrapper that uses standard Lua.c is 
exactly that.
Basically we try to build LuaCheia so that it's parts can be used by 
_any_ loadlib() enabled Lua-interpreter.

I'm not sure how well CGILua can be integrated in LuaCheia as I don't 
know much about it's achitecture (last CGILua is looked at must have ben 
3.2 based)
But I absolutly support being as compatible as possible.

I'm personally very interested in having a Lua httpd so I think working 
together here will be natural.

cheers, Martin

André Carregal wrote:

>Martin,
>
>As you may have noticed, I'm working with the Kepler Project team in the new
>version of CGILua. Since the LuaCheia and the Kepler Project have some
>common goals, I'd like to ask you if your team would like to join efforts
>with ours.
>
>Correct me if I'm wrong, but LuaCheia seems to be targeting the desktop Lua
>solution while Kepler aims at the web server (desktop or not). Having two
>solutions to handle web pages (yours cgi module and CGILua) and two
>implementations of a standalone web server seems to be a waste of resources
>for both teams.
>
>The Kepler team is just finishing the alpha version of CGILua 5.0 which
>offers CGI, FastCGI and mod Apache bindings. We are starting the new
>bindings (ISAPI, Servlet and Zope), and a standalone HTTP server to use
>Kepler in other platforms.
>
>Would you consider settling on CGILua as a Lua web server standard? Would
>you like to join our efforts in the HTTP server construction?
>
>LuaCheia could use CGILua and the integrated web server as much as Kepler
>will use them, leveraging the field for both projects. If someone would like
>to have the full Lua solution it would get LuaCheia (as the name implies)
>but if someone just
>want to have a Lua web solution, it could use Kepler as a smaller footprint
>solution.
>
>Both would be compatible at the architecture/template level and LuaCheia
>would be a natural migration path for Kepler installations.
>
>Please let me know if you need any further info, and thanks in advance for
>any feedback.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>Andre Carregal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id70&alloc_id638&op=click