Re: [m-users.] Correct use of solutions.
Volker Wysk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.mercury.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Montag, dem 31.07.2023 um 11:58 +1000 schrieb Mark Brown: > In all seriousness, I think SWI Prolog is an excellent system with > which to implement a compiler. Even if intending to build a compiler > in Mercury in the long term, rapidly prototyping (parts of) it in > Prolog is often an excellent approach to take in my opinion. I thought that, too. But when I rapidly prototyped my command line parser in Prolog, I found that I missed types, determinism categories, modes... Declarative IO is something like this, too, but wasn't important for that command line parser. Things that help to get your head straight. I came to the conclusion that doing it "right" from the beginning is better. (That parser turned out to be much more involved than I thought.) But it's a matter of taste, I guess. Bye Volker _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mercurylang.org/listinfo/users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE6QXGh82Ov3+2nrxp+K4ydFOsHoUFAmTHhGcACgkQ+K4ydFOs HoVSxQ//R+CrhiLU3rbVIDp7A+MaIgPnI2xxuJ7PX9NIw9iLKSU93EpfH7gElbfS xTV200+wcpdcmSC6P4ywdmuKer/pH0oagml4ciSX8rQli+DrudRm4o4WFQttaDZT b7ZH085soreOS0HYWUa3WUhxrU+krwyJe8XWL/K/0Hv0/6eRS9TpgzOZ+hvH4PyC QdcQYGMQJNpcdw0lIqtSrZp/jfI1cUCV/SYJTQw2sni70PKCIcrSKYjudPc6mpvZ uUwT0iLSHv0xjXQR3X51gT/jMC9DC8UOa8STjIKuBorPWfSs1CTrk5Sg353SHYYd 2Y0vYUYEmQynuTQkUZULXs2O50W/ADAvm0D3bXzjoEE2GuIF9SFAkYa5eCvSiHvK JmI01zEsxH55bVFwXS/4XyedO5+dupKwSuBSRdiBh1PSdJaEmqh1DD7vuqs+cflI Yv5gO6HkCkbqduTdJM8xqOa3EoW5LukgVph6Ha6HE5bL0R9q702KgKvXCthW/rnF XFCYb5W1amx8+3RKCspWAAFB1zMstE0P53IBAiXzHntsx96l//lDH2c0djd0STVS vpsvmdJfUoC4SEIzWGWW8xk0wjLGLh6QnqZIp7ZcgQNqAd1T6iUk1RJXYsb10Zle uT7iyIwYbuvER9X8Bff0J6Pf90QONTHraMVHkRgV3JBeNRFG4/0= =qK3s -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----