Re: [m-users.] Random Number Generator
Volker Wysk <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.mercury.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am Montag, dem 31.07.2023 um 23:28 +1000 schrieb Zoltan Somogyi: > This does bring up what I think is the root issue raised by the original > question, which is: given that the urandom type class could be designed > without this extra argument (since its instances could include > the info that is now in the extra argument in the rng state instead), > why wasn't that design chosen? Yes, that's what I was wondering. And if it was possible to get rid of that extra argument. Cheers Volker _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mercurylang.org/listinfo/users
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEE6QXGh82Ov3+2nrxp+K4ydFOsHoUFAmTIvPMACgkQ+K4ydFOs HoUmqg//b3m3l563MwvzjiE3x7MWxrLvO5te/X7HDcaaal5bHa8n+o31M5UYK+lg 3VSSYmNQupU3snihewSf37Qtiy91inyZeuKMOcDeub6LlbvmyExaG/g5+OCpDI8n CgB38SPX+cBHDyctf/Uby9yV/hmRY/cYyz0GqcvxuLcm3Ue+headkWCg2eoPOtI3 YCIxomsqRFl3OYZHpka+r4OaNTioRToPLNTwIPqoAppigZAcpl34gNiw1BpI8hkb CXbBXLZnCRJ869rf3/79cdJa2dWsqT1YY6heafwQLI99Foa5fpvCRlL4Xoh6WlNp PGUpptP3eL5mnD5siHD2z8mEZVaiFasXl/O4RNeewRHRnIlfr1JLxz242vX3vwxf 5M6LH+McxwqOGbk+8D7jxF7PxkNXNYLrK1IV8L74hd1doKfTO6RVlwI2M3XTdPRd MWA6zBCOD+SoXMR3agSi4B8tDPQJNkBp54CrE9pDWoL324DlHYSVb1+lI8fANK4+ G9Lz0ValCQ9mEy1ZKO2uVnWleyBURYdaa37acMVXOhQ6kD/6MloqjkpFkEfj9BJG B9CoBoKrBaKiRNSVyzudX1IcP4mJZ5Hz+fw2e30PVmnhcRvJPgVswZEouXAgrtDK XwN7E8nKvbd5nxpVNW/nvPiLNW6BUib2vT+loIMmMtifYnGQPxo= =dOxq -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----