Re: [m-users.] users Digest, Vol 107, Issue 14
"Sean Charles (emacstheviking)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.mercury.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Nice to hear! > On 16 Oct 2023, at 15:07, Volker Wysk <[email protected]> wrote: > > Am Montag, dem 16.10.2023 um 15:39 +0200 schrieb Michel Vanden Bossche: >>> On Sat, 14 Oct 2023, Matthew Delaney wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, I'm new to Mercury but am interested in using it to replace Prolog >>>> in a project I'm just starting. This project will need a web-interface >>>> and backend DB connectivity. Reading through Mercury's documentation, >>>> it looks like the most straightforward approach would be to use CGI >>>> for the Web App part and the Foreign Language Interface for DB >>>> connectivity. Is that correct or are there other options available? >>> >>> If you're using one of the Java or .NET web frameworks, you can compile >>> your Mercury to a Java or C# library respectively and call it from the >>> framework. >>> >>> Julien. >> >> Our experience with the Java backend is that it offers great performance. >> A Mercury application complied to Java is viewed from the outside as a >> standard Java application (Spring Boot…) and can be easily deployed in the >> cloud, using Kubernetes for scalability. Just in case… > > I've programmed in Java many years ago. And I think that the asm_fast grade > must be WAY faster than Java. I have two time critical Mercury projects and > the performance is astonishing. > > Cheers, > Volker > _______________________________________________ > users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mercurylang.org/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mercurylang.org/listinfo/users