Re: past and future of mlton.org
Adam Goode <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.ml.mlton.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 03/04/2010 09:54 AM, Matthew Fluet wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Adam Goode <[email protected]> wrote: >> Moving to Google Code sounds like a great idea. I can tell you that >> Fedora's interpretation of MLton's license is "MIT", so that is >> compatible with code hosting. > > Hmm. The copyright/license headers in code files states: > > # MLton is released under a BSD-style license. > # See the file MLton-LICENSE for details. > > But, IANAL. (And, perhaps, the MIT license is considered a "BSD-style > license".) By their analysis, it's the "MLton variant" of the MIT license. It's the text of the license that matters (structural equivalence instead of nominal?). http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#MLton_variant Adam _______________________________________________ MLton mailing list [email protected] http://mlton.org/mailman/listinfo/mlton
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 261 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuPzhcACgkQlenB4PQRJayoDgCgjv7m5IXiqa/rNK9yZg38KBy8 4n0An2jMfVp4E2k7ZqCqo8rMRbPUB6g1 =K8xG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----