Re: Re[2]: mmc patch
David Hakim <dhakim-Gkm/TONP9n1Wk0Htik3J/[email protected]> Tue, 28 Jan 2003 03:57:23 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.moto.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 12:40 AM, Cyb.org wrote: > Hello David, > Monday, January 27, 2003, 7:47:37 PM, you wrote: >> mmc -n mysite /home/mysite >> mmc -i -n mysite /home/mysite >> mmc -i <path> -n mysite /home/mysite >> which would drop off mod_mysite.so in whatever path was specified ? >> I think that might be kinda cool too :) >> -Dave > > Since MMC is shell script it can't (man sh) have arguments with or > wirthout values at the same time. There can be only one... ;) ...soooo Oh ... thats too bad ... shows what I know about shell scripts :) > I suggest to create: > -c - install into current dir > -l - install into libexec > -p [path] - install into specified path > or even rewrite MMC in C. What do you think? > Funny ... mmc used to be in C ... a long long time ago :) But I made the decision that any app whose sole responsibility was to call a bunch of other apps should probably be written in a shell scripting language ... if only for ease of maintenance. I guess a -p option would work ... I'm wondering though if we should just keep -i without the -p option for now and maybe just rewrite it in perl down the road :) I'd hate to make a sub-optimal interface decision here because of limitations in the language mmc is written in. What do you guys think ? -Dave > Cyb.org > >