[ nice-Bugs-904327 ] runtime Argument #0 to 'vend' has wrong type

Bugs item #904327, was opened at 2004-02-25 08:13
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by igouy
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112788&aid=904327&group_id=12788

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Priority: 3
Submitted By: Isaac Gouy (igouy)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: runtime Argument #0 to 'vend' has wrong type

Initial Comment:
Three packages:

//---------------------------
package vendor;
public class Vendor {}

//---------------------------
package test;
import vendor;

public interface ITest {}

public void vend(ITest i){ println("ITest"); }

class vendor.Vendor implements ITest;

//---------------------------
package main;
import vendor;
import test;

void main(String[] args){
   Vendor a = new Vendor();
   a.vend();
}

//---------------------------


>nicec -R -a t.jar main
nice.lang: parsing
vendor: parsing
test: parsing
main: parsing
vendor: typechecking
vendor: generating code
test: typechecking
test: generating code
main: typechecking
main: generating code
main: linking
main: writing in archive
vendor: writing in archive
nice.lang: writing in archive
test: writing in archive

>java -jar t.jar
Exception in thread "main" Argument #0 to 'vend' has 
wrong type
        at gnu.mapping.WrongType.make
(WrongType.java:56)
        at main.fun.main(main.nice:8)
        at main.dispatch.main(dispatch.nice)


Nice compiler version 0.9.7 (build 2004.02.25, 13:20:37 
UTC)





----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Isaac Gouy (igouy)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:15

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=536291

>Please adjust the priority field of this report depending on
>how useful that feature would be for you.

Of course, everything is high priority - it's just that 
somethings are higher priority than others ;-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Daniel Bonniot (bonniot)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=88952

Right, having an imported class implement a non-abstract
interface is not supported at the moment. Please adjust the
priority field of this report depending on how useful that
feature would be for you.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112788&aid=904327&group_id=12788


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click