[ nice-Bugs-1090679 ] no type error, but should be
"SourceForge.net" <[email protected]> Thu, 23 Dec 2004 19:03:39 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.nice.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Bugs item #1090679, was opened at 2004-12-23 22:03
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112788&aid=1090679&group_id=12788
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: mike.beckerle (mbeckerle)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: no type error, but should be
Initial Comment:
I have a runtime error that should be a type error at
compile time:
package bug1;
(?int, int) foo(byte by, int pos) {
if ((by & 0x80) == 0x80) {
return (null, pos);
}
return (by, pos);
}
void _test_foo() {
var ?int charcode = null;
var int pos = 0;
var res = foo(65, 0);
(charcode, pos) = res;
println(charcode); //prints 65
// assert(charcode != null);
assert(charcode == 65); // Fails, at run time. Succeeds
if above assert is not commented out.
// assert(charcode == new java.lang.Integer(65)); //
also fails same way
// I think the above should fail to typecheck at compile
time since ?int == int should fail to check.
assert(pos == 0);
}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=112788&aid=1090679&group_id=12788
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/