Re: Anonymous functions bug?

> We have to decide:
> if we allow return e; in a void method

This is the usual use case in c++.
It's more convenient then to write a separate return every time.

if( condition ) return buf.append( aaa ).append( bbb );
buf.append( ccc = ... );

I wish it would be allowed...

> if we allow   void foo(StringBuffer buf, String s) = buf.append(s);

I think it's a contradiction to allow
void foo(StringBuffer buf, String s) = buf.append(s);
and not to allow
return buf.append(s);




-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click