Re: Visibility
Rohan Hart <[email protected]> Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:50:51 +1300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.nice.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005, Daniel Bonniot said: > I've started to put in place the infrastructure to support proper > visibility checking and imports. As a proof of concept, visibility > is now enforced (in CVS) for toplevel values and variables > (private, "default" and public). Is this visibility to be enforced by the JVM? If yes, then what mappings have you assigned? > This would be the good time to hear ideas about the kind of > visibility control is desirable. Is the private/default/public > model good enough? local: can not be specialised outside the defining package even if it can be called in that context - a modifier to the above visibilities and not the default Rohan ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click