Re: Re: suggestions for newbee
Rohan Hart <[email protected]> Thu, 07 Jul 2005 17:21:55 +1200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.nice.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi David On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, David Bernard said: >>> I forgot some note about 'class addon'. If I want/need to add some >>> method to Worker in another project/lib, then in the second project I >>> create a file Worker.addon.nice in the same directory hierarchy >>> (package) as the orginal Worker.nice. Like this it's easier tho know >>> where is an implementation if you know the target class. There is a fundamental difference between Nice and Java - Nice methods generally have no "target" class. Sure there's sugar and preferential treatment given to the (potentially implicit) first parameter but really a class is just somewhere to store some data. I said "generally no target" because methods with only one parameter could be considered to be assigned to that class. Obviously a class is also associated with some set of methods but the class doesn't absolutely define that set. > prj2/ > lib/ > prj1.jar > src/nice/ > int.addon.nice //addon to int This is outside a package - how is it included? Nice imports packages, not jars. > pkg2.pkg22/ > MyClassA.nice // an other class than pkg1.pkg11.pkg111.MyClassA > MyClassC.nice > pkg1.pkg11.pkg111 > MyClassA.addon.nice // definition of addons (methods, abstract > interface) to the MyClassA define in prj1 These add-ons should not *need* to be defined in the original package as that makes security harder. Think of what Java would be like if classes could *only* be extended within their package. On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, David Bernard said: > I don't agree see (my other reply). several class in one file is > practical only for little application or project with one developper. >> I liked the Java way at first, too. But later i found i have troubles >> creating classes, becouse i need a separate file for each class, even >> for minor ones. This eventually leads to "thick interfaces". > I agree with you I use a lot for "struct" (inner or not) but it's > difficult for co-develloper, and promote the creation of duplicate Class > (helper, inner struct,...) in big project where developper don't know > every classes (only take an overview of first level classes). Sitting next to me is a large Java code-base and I can assure you that one class per file isn't much protection from duplication, especially of helpers. Maybe Nice should have one method per file? ... Joking, joking!!! Rohan ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click