Re: Re: Curious about method handling

The question you quote began with "Also".

The first question was:
'The former command prints "#<procedure f>", whilst the latter prints
"Hello World". Why the difference in syntax between class methods and
non-class methods?'


--- Artem Gr <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Maybe I'm missing the point of the original question, or maybe
> you're
> > missing the point of the original question ;-)
> >=20
> > For a function, we can both refer to the function and refer to the
> > result of the function:
> > f
> > f()
> >=20
> > I think the original questioner wanted to have those same two kinds
> of
> > reference but for an object method:
> > new A().g
> > new A().g()
>=20
> The question was:
>=20
> "Also, is there any way of passing a class method as an argument
> without
> wrapping it in an anonymous method?"
>=20
> To wich the (not tested) example is:
>=20
> // Pass the A.g class method to the repeater.
> repeatOnA( new A(), g );



	=09
____________________________________________________
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page=20
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs=20
=20


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practic=
es
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & Q=
A
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf