Re: But is it Object-Oriented?
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.nice.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> BTW, Java is specified roughly in the same way, and uses the name > "compilation units" for "modules". And the significant difference is, of course, that Java doesn't use a "compilation unit" for encapsulation - Java uses types (classes and interfaces) for encapsulation. And as a consequence, we can take code unchanged from different Java compilation units, and put it in a single compilation unit without changing meaning. If we try to do that with the current proposal then we'll see "private" things become visible where they weren't before. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click