Re: But is it Object-Oriented?
Isaac Gouy <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.lang.nice.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> >Which means that the top-level class provides a syntactic boundary > >for the "compilation unit" - no such boundary in Nice. > We could add a construct for isolating a unit, and then either force > each "file" to contain units (a la Java, seems redundant) or make > each file an implicit module, but allow nested modules (a la ocaml). Or we could simplify: only visible within a package, visible where-ever the package is imported - default (package) and public. > >What to do in Nice? > This seems to me a different issue, which is how to define > 'protected' in Nice. One possibility could be ... Not sure how much of that I followed ;-) Maybe with basic visibility default/public in-place we'll be able to understand the issues better. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want. http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click